User talk:HagermanBot
Please leave comments at User talk:Hagerman.
This is a automated to all bot operators
Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
My edit on Poverty
It is right that I have unsigned but the moment I realised I immediately edited but the system become unoperative as Bot started working and the entire system hanged as I was in edit mode and bot cound not edit till I finish. I am not signing this comment.
This bot doing insulting work.vkvora 16:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
sorry, I keep on forgetting to sign my edits. Will do from now on Morpheuschongsies 05:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Relax
Wow, I forgot to sign an edit and now I am getting chastised by a bot. Relax a little, I forgot to sign and then went back and signed my edit immeadiatly. Gimme a chance!! EMT1871 00:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)(see I didnt forget this time!!!!)
- Rather than say “relax”, let's say lag. It's a bit much when you act in less than a minute. —SlamDiego 20:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Automated message to bot owners
As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:
Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.
Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 02:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Great bot
This bot's doing some great work. People who hadn't signed my talk page had their comments signed with the unsigned user template within seconds. I'm almost sure one happened less than a second! Great work. ĤĶ51→Łalk 20:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
A good idea in theory...
...but the bot is not sophisticated enough to spot all forms of signature. DavidFarmbrough 00:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thx
thank you, that will come in handy! Nonononono 05:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Bot still being a pain
Enough with this bot already.