Jump to content

User talk:Nuttyprofessor2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jéské Couriano (talk | contribs) at 19:19, 3 September 2022 (→Assessment of your sources for User:Nuttyprofessor2016/sandbox: Re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Nuttyprofessor2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Uncletomwood (talk) 19:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Avesthagen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nuttyprofessor2016 (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav Maloo (April 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Mainspace page is salted as well.
Eternal Shadow Talk 18:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nuttyprofessor2016! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eternal Shadow Talk 18:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav Maloo (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CodeLyoko were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Looking at the sources added since the last decline, I do not see very much that will make this pass WP:BIO, The Forbes India post is a paid post, CEOInsights is not a news source and does not seem very reliable, and the Newsx one is only really a interview with really no deep coverage of the topic.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CodeLyokotalk 23:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vaibhav Maloo

Hello, Nuttyprofessor2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vaibhav Maloo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of your sources for User:Nuttyprofessor2016/sandbox

Refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:

In summary, in order for your draft to stand a chance in hell of being accepted the two walled sources would need to be absolutely perfect - and it's highly unlikely either of them are, given the nature of the rest of your sources. I predict your request to lower the protection level on Vaibhav Maloo's article will be declined, if it hasn't been while I've been writing this. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does this help?

https://www.outlookindia.com/business-spotlight/meet-vaibhav-maloo-a-visionary-progressive-thinker-and-change-maker-in-the-world-of-business--news-220682

No (No editorial oversight). "Outlook for Brands" = churnalism. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nuttyprofessor2016&oldid=1108322772"