Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuil Grinshpun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuil Grinshpun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real indication of notability or significant coverage, just passing mentions. It’s worth noting that the article creator has almost no other edits; given the subject’s wealth, hm. - Biruitorul ^Talk 03:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Moldova. Shellwood (talk) 08:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment searching this person's name in Google at the news section gives 12 articles, most recent, which can be used as sources. Super Ψ Dro 09:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep going through the refs used within the article, as well as sources available about them online, they pass WP:GNG - multiple in-depth articles in reliable publications that are independent of the subject. Angiewalter37 (talk) 01:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be helpful if you provided an example. Please show us at least one source that you believe strengthens a claim to passing WP:ANYBIO. — Biruitorul ^Talk 10:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless better sources are found. I went through the sources in the article and there are none that are significantly about him - they are all name-checks, and cannot even be used to support his educational info. A search online turns up at least a dozen sites with bios of him, and they all begin "Emmanuil Grinshpun is a highly regarded philanthropist and world-renowned entrepreneur ..." which leads me to believe that 1) there is only one bio and 2) it is a PR piece. Clearly a person contributing to his community, but lacking the reliable, significant sources required for Wikipedia. Lamona (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:PROMO. Non-notable individual who has a lot of money and is well connected. Subject lacks significant coverage. I can't find anything more reliable that the PR pieces used. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.