Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namify (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Namify

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renominating this as two of the three keep voters in the previous AFD were UPE spammers: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy. Likely non-notable. Undisclosed paid-for spam, clearly not a good faith attempt at an encyclopedia article. I would delete this G5 except for the previous AFD. MER-C 11:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Computing. MER-C 11:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A search brings up PR hits and not much else. Oaktree b (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any significant, third-party coverage to establish notability for the company. Fabiobengario (talk) 09:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also can't find notable sources about this dime-a-dozen website. Skynxnex (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No substantial independent coverage. Thparkth (talk) 03:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.