Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/FAQ
Appearance
- The RFC question is non-neutral! We need to stop this RFC now!
- Your side is losing, isn't it?
- The RFC question is not brief. Can I fix it?
- The "question" is the part that shows up on the RFC listing pages (example of listing page). If the RFC question itself is substantially longer than all the others and you are not appearing in the role of the loyal opposition, then you can copy a small part the original question plus the original timestamp (not usually the name) to the top or write a simplified question. If, however, the person who started the RFC discussion might consider you to be part of the dispute, you should ask someone else to adjust it (e.g., by asking the person who started the RFC to shorten it or by posting a note on the RFC talk page).
- I don't like any of the options I've been asked to vote for.
- RFCs aren't votes. You can suggest a compromise or an option that others haven't considered, exactly like you would in any other talk page discussion.
- How long should an RFC last?
- As long as all of the participants need, and no longer. If you started an RFC, and you believe your proposal will not achieve consensus, you permitted to admit defeat and withdraw it at any time. However, editors who believe their side is winning are advised to not even mention the possibility of ending an RFC early during the first week.