User talk:Bverji

Welcome!

Hello, Bverji, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RedState, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. — Newslinger talk 20:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

re Wing Chun

Hello Bverji. I reverted your recent edits on Wing Chun because, contrary to what you said in one of your edit summaries, you received no consensus for these rather big changes to the article, and in fact only got one person disagreeing with you. Please hold off on these changes until you have consensus. Thanks, PopoDameron (talk) 03:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This was a separate matter then what was discussed before. I wasn't indicating that I got a consensus, but referring to the fact that on the talk page I mentioned the reason I removed the section is that the list needed to be moved to a list page. You were reverting things that are unsourced, things put on the article page that already has list page for, and lists that should have their own page. None of this is anything that there should need to be a consensus for, they all break established rules of wikipedia.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bverji reported by User:PopoDameron (Result:* No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. The reverts stopped after this report. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC) )]]. Thank you. PopoDameron (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)