Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benedicte Find
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:13, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Benedicte Find (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable biography. The article has only two sources. One is a list of company shareholders for Coloplast, so a primary source and not significant coverage. The second is this profile on Forbes which is a very brief overview of Find and not, in opinion, significant coverage. After looking through Google & Google News, the only other source I could find is this page, where Find is listed as one of 50 pandemic billionaires, but only the barest of details are given. At the very best, there is one reliable source with significant coverage (although, as I said, I'd dispute the significance of the coverage), so this fails GNG. WJ94 (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Architecture. WJ94 (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Article is a one-sentence long stub that does not establsh why she is a notable billionare.TH1980 (talk) 23:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.