User talk:BigFrank100

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, peer review, and project-wide collaboration.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 05:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey he has been He has been harassing me and Tony360X. Give him a warning -BigFrank100

It's a perfectly valid sock suspicion page. You can refute his claim without resorting to personal attacks. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He will not droup the issue and he has no real strong evidence against me. Only that I supported Tony360X version of the article. I find that a personal attack aginst my credablity. - -BigFrank100

Plea for Un-blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigFrank100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked un-justly because pbryan had accused me of being a sock puppet. The story behind this that on February 11 2007 I was accused of being a Sock puppet for user Tony360X, his evidence was that we supported a certain issue and that we have had spelling errors. Ten days passed with no action and according to Wikipedia policy I could remove the banner that claimed I was a sock puppet and all charges brought up on me would be dropped. Now today on February 21 I am banned because Pomte brings up some last minute accusations against me and Tony360X. This reason I have been banned with out a certain limited placed on me. So I requested to be unblocked for I am not a sock puppet of Tony360X and that user pbryan has been harassing me and I wish for it to end now. I do not wish for to be ban but an administrator who hears my plea to ask him kindly to end this grudge or feud he has against me. To who ever is reading this I would like to thank you for a moment of your time.

Decline reason:

You appear to be a confirmed sockpuppet, as per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X. -- Yamla 21:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pardon me Yamla but did you even read my reason to be unblocked or did you just look at reason as to why I was blocked. I feel it is always best to hear both sides of a story before coming with a reasonable answer. I ask you please to reconsider this and listen to my plea. Thank You – BigFrank100, Feb 21 2007

I thought Betacommand's analysis had established a strong confirmation of sockpuppetry. May I suggest that if you truly are not a sockpuppet of Tony360X, then perhaps you could request a Wikipedia:Checkuser to help clear your name. pbryan 23:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having trouble with it. Can you show me how to put in a request. - User:BigFrank100

I don't think you can directly ask for one (being currently blocked), but you could add a request for checkuser as a part of an unblock request, or you could also add a checkuser request anonymously and plea your case to Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser. pbryan 22:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortuantely, I don't think they'll do it. See the header on top of WP:RFCU, namely:

Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence"
These requests are not performed. Please do not ask.

I'm not sure enough about the situation to deny or accept an unblock request. The last resort is the unblock-en-l mailing list. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Plea

BigFrank100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fist of I wish some one new to take up my case. I was blocked un-justly because pbryan had accused me of being a sock puppet. The story behind this that on February 11 2007 I was accused of being a Sock puppet for user Tony360X, his evidence was that we supported a certain issue and that we have had spelling errors. Ten days passed with no action and according to Wikipedia policy I could remove the banner that claimed I was a sock puppet and all charges brought up on me would be dropped. Now today on February 21 I am banned because Pomte brings up some last minute accusations against me and Tony360X. This reason I have been banned with out a certain limited placed on me. So I requested to be unblocked for I am not a sock puppet of Tony360X and that the evidence used aginst me was flawed and that during my time with Wikipedia I have contributed a good deal to different articles and helped out a lot. To who ever is reading this I would like to thank you for a moment of your time.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I'm convinced you are the same user as Tony360X. If this really isn't true, it's probably better for you to just create a new account for yourself and give up on this one. Mango juice^talk 14:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check User

BigFrank100 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Third Plea for Un-Block

BigFrank100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all I wish for some one new to take up my case. I was blocked un-justly because pbryan had accused me of being a sock puppet. The story behind this that on February 11 2007 I was accused of being a Sock puppet for user Tony360X, his evidence was that we supported a certain issue and that we have had spelling errors. Ten days passed with no action and according to Wikipedia policy I could remove the banner that claimed I was a sock puppet and all charges brought up on me would be dropped. Now today on February 21 I am banned because Pomte brings up some last minute accusations against me and Tony360X. This reason I have been banned with out a certain limited placed on me. So I requested to be unblocked for I am not a sock puppet of Tony360X and that the evidence used aginst me was flawed and that during my time with Wikipedia I have contributed a good deal to different articles and helped out a lot. I also request a check user to prove my innocence. To who ever is reading this I would like to thank you for a moment of your time.

Decline reason:

This is exactly the same reason you gave when I denied your unblock request. No RFCU can be filed in this case, as this just isn't one of the situations where a Checkuser request is appropriate: see WP:RFCU. Take my advice and just start over. Mango juice^talk 04:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First off I wanted a new guy to reviwe me and not another bias lacky of pbryan. Second why sould I make a new profile? So Mr.pbryan could acuess me of being a puppet again. I think not. I want justice. I will do anything to prove my innocence. - BigFrank100

I don't know what constitutes justice in your view, but you can be reasonably assured that: a) I won't accuse anyone of being a sockpuppet without reasonable cause, and b) should you be accused again, nobody will block you without independently reviewing the evidence presented. pbryan 21:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I constitutes justice as being a) un-blocked and b) left alone so I could share my knowldge with people on wikipedia. - BigFrank100