Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tittytainment (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2022 October 10.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tittytainment[edit]

Unless the article is rewritten, esp the intro (WP:NPOV WP:Verifiability), I'm going to keep nominating this for AfD. Additionally the references contain NO mention of the term in question... ☭ cmn ☭ ( ❝❞ /✍ ) 22:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 20:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or smerge, a one-man neologism that has not received any wider currency. Guy (Help!) 21:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would say speedy but it seems the term does exist...among the "Trilateral Commission? OMG NWO!" lunatics. WP:FRINGE, WP:NEO, WP:NPOV, I could go on. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 23:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep,It's real and upcoming phenomenon in the process of globalization.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 02:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.