Jump to content

Talk:Health law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InsaneHacker (talk | contribs) at 20:20, 22 October 2022 (→‎Merger proposal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Beginings

This is an important legal topic. I don't like redirecting it to a category, but it really needs some work.Mneumisi 20:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Health legislation appears to be basically the same page, just written by someone else. I think that they should be merged into a single page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Health legislation is where much of our health law comes from, but it is a separate, related subject. The law-making process is what legislation focusses on, while health law focusses on existing legal and ethical rules affecting health care, medical training, and many other subjects that have nothing directly to do with health legislation. Health law comes not just from legislation but from court decisions, from common law, and from administrative/governmental rule-making. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.54.70.20 (talk) 15:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose merging Medical law into Health law and rewriting the article to cover the subject matter of both articles. In my experience with health law, I do not recognize the distinction currently upheld between the two articles, where health law supposedly refers to "macro" issues (e.g. "operations, regulatory and transactional issues") whereas medical law supposedly refers to "micro" issues such as the duties of clinicians and the rights of patients (the latter definition appears to be based exclusively on an American instead of an international, comparative context). Instead, the terms "health law" or "medical law" are synonymous and refer to a legal field dealing with both issues.

Examples are legion. For example, the content of The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law cuts across both of these issue areas regardless of being a book on "health law". Also, readers of the European Journal of Health Law and the Medical Law Review will know that neither journal is restricted to one issue area specifically.

The choice of health law over medical law for the name of the article is based on my – admittedly anecdotal – experience that medical law is often used in the UK, whereas health law is more prevalent in international discourses. Crucially however, the point is that both terms refer to the same thing, and thus, we don't need two articles. Which title is used is less important to me.

I will notify WikiProject Medicine and WikiProject Law about this discussion. InsaneHacker (💬) 20:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A merger would also require dealing with the {{Medical law sidebar}}. InsaneHacker (💬) 20:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed that "latter" in my original post should in reality be "former". InsaneHacker (💬) 11:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The synonymousness of health law and medical law is also noted by Hervey and McHale in European Union Health Law, p. 10. InsaneHacker (💬) 20:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]