Endorse as a correct reading of consensus to delete. However, allow recreation based on the significant coverage posted here. Such a new article can be challenged at AFD if someone wishes to go that route. FrankAnchor 17:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Allow recreation doesn't look like BLP1E to me, but it certainly might be AfD'ed on those grounds. Drafting is reasonable, as is userification for integration of these new sources. Jclemens (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Allow recreation per nom, substantial new sources overcoming the AfD arguments. Not a private person, and plenty of verification, so I think this should be considered a BIO1E not a BLP1E, and possibly it should be redirected to Herschel Walker#Relationships and children. Possibly it meets the threshold for a stand alone article. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse as a correct reading of the AFD. No bar to recreation; the article is not salted. Stifle (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse the close of the AFD. Review of draft or recreation of article are permitted, but are subject to new AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
