User talk:Michawn2003

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. El_C 00:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dale Earnhardt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hobbs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rs chen 7754 18:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of European road signs

Please stop making changes to this article that are not representative of the facts.

In the UK, priority signs must be used in combination with their supplementary plate, as seen here. They are a pair and the supplementary plate is not optional.
Germany and Slovakia use the same warning sign for both guarded and unguarded railway crossings. Leaving the guarded crossing section blank is not accurate because it implies that they only have a sign for unguarded crossings and guarded crossings are left unsigned.

Comments such as "I don't want that" are not valid and will also be reverted. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to revert your changes until you provide a valid reason and your changes are supported by the facts. If you continue to make these changes without proper reasoning, you will be reported for vandalism. Fry1989 ^eh? 14:47, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask you one last time to cease your revisions. As I explained in my past edit summaries, the text was de-bolded to make the tables more compact. The page is extremely large as it is. The line breaks you keep removing are also there for a reason; so that various images line up correctly. If you will look carefully, you will notice that without the line breaks the flag of the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom do not line up with the rest. Some Swiss signs similarly need the line break to line them up with the others because of the notations insisted upon by ZH8000. The regulations in the United Kingdom for signing vehicle length restrictions also requires both the Imperial and Metric signs to be used together. It is not option to choose one or the other. Please discuss changes on the talk page if you are unsure. If you continue to revert, it will be considered an edit war, and neither of us want that. Fry1989 ^eh? 01:08, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please not make something have two meanings. The greyed out sections are for when a country does not use a sign at all, such as the priority road signs which Ireland does not have. That isn't the same as a country using a sign but us lacking the image. The restricted parking zone is an example, Denmark uses the sign, we have the end of zone sign but currently lack the entry sign to the zone. File:No image available.svg was pre-existing on Commons, but if you think there's a better one, such as File:Oxygen480-status-image-missing.svg, by all means use it. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia.

This includes, but is not limited to, removal of previously correct content without providing a source as to why or how it is no longer correct. That you have discovered it is incorrect is by itself original reserch which is not allowed in any circumstances. 86.164.128.239 (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]