Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NiklausGerard was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
“Lawyer up” is one source that satisfies what is needed to establish notability, but still should have more. Once they are added feel free to ping me and we can clean up the draft and accept the submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Przybylop!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NiklausGerard (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alexandermcnabb were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
There still are not enough WP:RS sources to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG] for this subject. As a businessperson, the subject would not normally be notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for taking time to review the page. I am hoping you may take additional time in clarifying feedback for me. The article focuses on his boxing accomplishments for the vast majority of the time, which has me questioning the, "As a businessperson, the subject would not normally be notable." His work in businesses is a merely a sidenote to it. Would taking the business part out make this article worth approving? If not, then I also have questions about the reliable sources. Even according to Wikipedia, The Oklahoman or TheDaily Oklahoman (as it was once known as) is the largest newspaper in Oklahoma and is essentially the state's paper of record. There are several articles from there cited in this draft. Credentials and info from both BoxRec.com (which nearly every boxer in Wikipedia has citations to) and ESPN.com are also there. The Norman Transcript was also cited as a reliable source, and the publication has its own Wikipedia entry. The Oklahoma Gazette was cited as a reliable source, and it, too, has its own Wikipedia entry. I've seen multiple boxers with less citations and less credible citations make it onto here. Almost every article has Zuhdi in its title and as its main focus. I'm wondering how/where to edit this. Thank you, again. Przybylop (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
Boxing Record section entirely unsourced. Rest of the article is broadly okay, apart from some MOS:CITEPUNCT issues.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for the notes. I believe I have corrected the problems or made sufficient progress in addressing them. The record and table is cited. The inconsistent punctuation/placement of citations has been largely corrected, too. Przybylop (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
