User talk:Universal Deus

Prince Jean, Count of Paris

Hello. I recently undid one of your edits to Jean, Count of Paris. You offered no citation of evidence for your claim that Prince Jean was "by absolute primogeniture, the heir to the defuct [sic] Empire of Brazil."

Furthermore, your claim is contrary to Article 119 of the Constitution of the the Empire of Brazil: "Art. 119. No foreigner can succeed to the Crown of the Empire of Brazil."

Have a wonderful day! CSBurksesq (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm DrKay. I noticed that you recently removed content from George V without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 07:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Universal Deus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to George V, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Second Punic War, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BlueNoise (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|1=the reason i have been blocked is due to "vandalism" i saw a table filled with random words on first bit of the page, so i removed it, if it was meant to be apart of the page i am truly sorry for undoing it Universal Deus (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Universal Deus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason i have been blocked is due to "vandalism" i saw a table filled with random words on first bit of the page, so i removed it, if it was meant to be apart of the page i am truly sorry for undoing it Universal Deus (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not accurately describe your edits. Yamla (talk) 23:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|1=i have been blocked for a long time could i be unblock now?}}

{unblock|1=i have been blocked for a long time could i be unblock now}} Universal Deus (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]