Jump to content

User talk:LinksWant2BeFree

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LinksWant2BeFree (talk | contribs) at 18:41, 8 March 2007 (→‎Last warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vandalism - warning test2

Please do not remove AfD tags without cause, or delete valid information to make a point. It is considered vandalism. If you wish to contest an AfD, please use proper procedures. Thank you. Ckatzchatspy 19:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "null" text in the header shouldn't have been there - it was a byproduct of the message script system. The above message now reads as it should. --Ckatzchatspy 20:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfD? Please STFU! --LinksWant2BeFree 20:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Civility and consider this an official warning. Femto 20:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

I think it's obvious enough that this account was created by User:Urod with the only purpose to continue the dispute with User:Requestion about external links at List of screen capture software.

This is your only warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did here, remove deletion tags, or disrupt to make a WP:POINT, you will be blocked.

Femto 12:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that I am not User:Urod, but just another person who happens to find User:Requestion an anally retentive, pedantic cocksmoker. --LinksWant2BeFree 20:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Bye. Femto 21:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, chill out. After your message I did not change any pages, with the exception of my own talk page. What is your problem? Also, according to Wikipedia:Blocking policy, a permanent block is not really in order here. --LinksWant2BeFree 22:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LinksWant2BeFree (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

For reasons stated above.

Decline reason:

Personal attack here after final warning. Personal attacks are not welcome even on user discussion pages. — Yamla 18:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

LinksWant2BeFree (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Would it be ok if I remove the offending passages from my user page?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Would it be ok if I remove the offending passages from my user page? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Would it be ok if I remove the offending passages from my user page? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Would it be ok if I remove the offending passages from my user page? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}