Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 MVV Maastricht season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 18:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2013–14 MVV Maastricht season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NSEASONS as club does not play in top division but played in 2013–14 Eerste Divisie. Qed237 (talk) 22:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into 2013–14 Eerste Divisie. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite) 23:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - Eerste Divisie is not a fully professional league. Current consensus is that only clubs that play in FPLs are notable enough to justify individual season articles. No sourced prose whatsoever in the article raises serious WP:NOTSTATS concerns. Fenix down (talk) 07:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - your right @GiantSnowman: I clicked on 2013–14 Eerste Divisie and saw Jupiler League, so thought Belgium and saw Maastricht and thought Belgium too and that Jupiler now sponsored both tiers. Whoops! Fenix down (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: What? They to play in second tier in Holland, I cant find them in 2013–14 Belgian Pro League and in the article it said they met Dordrecht and Jong Ajax and they play in Holland second tier. Qed237 (talk) 18:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - err @Qed237: @Fenix down: the Eerste Divisie i.e. the Dutch 2nd division is fully-professional, so this does meet NSEASONS...needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 17:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Okay I was not aware of the Fully-pro requirement. Do you have a link to that consensus so I can verify that we should go by that and not NSEASONS? Qed237 (talk) 18:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 17:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per GiantSnowman and meets WP:NSEASONS.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.