Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Windsor
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by SheepLinterBot (talk | contribs) at 22:43, 31 January 2023 (→[[Adam Windsor]]: [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adam Windsor[edit]
- Adam Windsor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails all three core content policies of WP:BLP. As it currently stands, the article resembles an autobiography or a fansite. I do not believe there is any material worth saving as subject is not demonstrated to meet general notability guidelines.
Single inline citation (Steve Austin's book) doesn't even refer to the subject. Other references are solely primary source or do not refer to the subject. Wikipedia is used as another source to "demonstrate" the subject is a "notable Coventrian". ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 05:11, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 05:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The person is non-notable, and the article resembles a biography from a fansite or an official site. Wikipedia is not a substitute for biographies and print encyclopedias of subjective topics and persons. --Gh87 (talk) 01:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this non-notable biography as the nomination states.Stormbay (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.