Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Jo Burns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Jo Burns

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer with one published book. Sources are primary or not reliable (blogs, social media). Searches found no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Neiltonks (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely not notable, especially since said lone published book is a memoir. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 15:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is built around works that she authored, not works about her, some of which are also her personal website or blogs she created, which means not even a little external monitoring. Having an article published in even a major publication does not make one notable. Even being a regular contributor to the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal or the Washington Post does not gaurantee that someone is notable. She is many orders of magnitude below that level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.