Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lundwall
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:44, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Non-notable individual lacking reliable sources seicer | talk | contribs 14:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrew Lundwall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability: This article apparently fails to meet our notability criteria. With all due respect to Mr. Lundwall, who wrote up his bio here, there do not seem to be sufficient citations in secondary literature (reliable sources) to keep this article. Currently, article has no citations, does not assert sufficient notability, and has been "notability" tagged for over 6 months. Thanks for your consideration. HG | Talk 17:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Thor Malmjursson (talk) 00:51, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not finding any third-party references. No g-news hits. Simple vanity. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find anything to merit notability either. Jeremiah (talk) 03:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.