Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Plummer (footballer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:45, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:45, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shereth 21:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrew Plummer (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails to meet WP:BIO per WP:Athlete for not having made a professional appearance. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete without prejudice. He fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:CRYSTAL as he has not yet competed professionally. Can't get much clearer. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 18:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He's now signed for a new club so a useful reference to any fans wanting to know his history. Will possibly be updated more regularly now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.168.176.1 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Being signed to a club, even a professional one, does not pass WP:ATHLETE. The fact that he's signed and probably will compete at a level that passes WP:ATHLETE does not pass WP:CRYSTAL. Once he has competed at a level that passes WP:ATHLETE, then the article should be recreated. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 22:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neither appearances for Ipswich Town youth sides or possible appearances for Bangor in the new N Irish league make for sufficient notability for this article be justified. - fchd (talk) 19:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as yet to make an appearance in a fully-pro league, so fails WP:ATHLETE, Recreate when/if he becomes notable. GiantSnowman 20:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete another footballer that isn't notable yet. No prejudice against recreation when he meets the criteria for inclusion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.