Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atmail
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Atmail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable,fails WP:V and WP:GNG. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak delete There is a bit of RS material out there but it does not look all that strong. If I can find time I might have a closer and more detailed look and I might swing over to weak keep but not for now. Aoziwe (talk) 11:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete gnews reveals solely industry press. I would say it needs some mainstream press coverage to get it passing WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 01:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.