Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. After three weeks of discussion, it seems unlikely that relisting again will have a benefit. The consensus is certainly more in favour of keeping, although policy-based arguments are somewhat lacking. Michig (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Certance[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. No substantial references provided.Please add references if notable Lakun.patra (talk) 14:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – This was a historically notable company, as the final form of Seagate's tape drive business. Seagate was one of 3 creators of the major tape format (LTO) and for 3 years this company was the worldwide market leader in shipments of tape drives. That is from an archive of the company's About page, which I just added. There was also one cite on the acquisition by Quantum. Unfortunately Certance's history-of-the-company page was never archived and is now gone. But that information may still be available elsewhere. – Margin1522 (talk) 00:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Survivor of major company. WP covers this area exhaustively. DGG ( talk ) 17:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (drone) @ 21:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (jive) @ 21:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.