Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Niosi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of references with a BLP Nakon 01:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Niosi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While a well known animator on the internet, heard of Kirbopher years ago, there doesn't seem to be any reliable sources on him. The references provided are from a Facebook page and a wikia so there's nothing going with this one. GamerPro64 03:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment given his credits, wouldn't WP:ENT cover this guy? Artw (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe but this is a living bibliography page. Shouldn't it need reliable sources?GamerPro64 03:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As a Biography of a living person, we should have at least one substantial source that is not from the subjects website, facebook, or a wiki. Without anything approaching that, we should delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.