Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Reginald Alford Promquery
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:32, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:32, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Count Reginald Alford Promquery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Awww. Do we really have to delete it? I want to be remembered after I leave this planet... Taylor.clapp 05:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- blah Pure hoax. And if anyone recognises whence the image has been ripped off, please say. -- RHaworth 06:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. You're right - he seems to live up to his article's initials. Grutness...wha? 06:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a pity; the author sure seemed to put a lot of time into fudging it. I got a kick out of reading it through, anyway... CA387 08:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Tikiwont 08:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Very reluctant delete one of the better hoaxes for a long while. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 09:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. So if you like it, copy it to WP:BJAODN. And curses I missed the initials! -- RHaworth 14:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, delete, more's the pity. A good laugh, even if the designation "Count" doesn't actually exist in the English peerage. He would have been an earl, which rather spoils the acronym. BTLizard 10:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Okay, the page is here. I have no clue what I'm doing with WP:BJAODN, though, so someone else will have to check to make sure everything's kosher. CA387 18:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. --Seattle Skier (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.