Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossroads Music (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:28, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:28, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru 07:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Crossroads Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Record label, who may have some notable clients, is not it's self notable. (see WP:Inherited) - Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG as it has not had significant coverage of it's own. Codf1977 (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Kept last time, why delete again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by T3h 1337 b0y (talk • contribs) 22:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- for the reason that all but one of the Keeps in the first AfD were based on inherited notability, and the other was based on WP:GOOGLEHITS. Codf1977 (talk) 09:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Notability is not inherited. Joe Chill (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no notability established with multiple third party reliable sources since last nomination in 2007.--Matt57 (talk•contribs) 00:15, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.