Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Phi Kappa
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:13, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:13, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to University of Southern California. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delta Phi Kappa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable club with only 1 chapter nationwide. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG standards of notability. Insufficient third party sources to establish notability. GrapedApe (talk) 03:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant sources; article is full of puffery. Could be redirected to University of Southern California#Traditions and student activities, although it is not mentioned there (the "Greek life" subsection does not name individual clubs). --MelanieN (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge What verified content is found in the article should be merged to the section mentioned by MelanieN and a redirect left in its place. If there is sufficient reliable source content to warrant a split it can be done so.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 14:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into its university's article.LuciferWildCat (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.