Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designated Hitter (game show)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:48, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:48, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 21:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Designated Hitter (game show) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I did prod this, but prod removed, no Ghits, link supplied is a snippet of the gameshow "Trivial Pursuit" on YouTube and the subsequently added link bears no relation to the article Richhoncho (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If I could see some primary sources on this article I'd be more than happy to remove the AfD.--Richhoncho (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You need to move the bar to 1:08 to get the "Designated Hitter" part of the video. TVfanatic2K (talk) 18:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Due to the lack of reliable sources and likely that sources would never be found, it only ran for 4 months in the 90's, and a pretty obscure show. Non-notable for these reasons. Boccobrock•T 20:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete I was under the impression that nationally broadcast TV shows were inherently notable, but this one seems to fail WP:V (it's tough to Google, though). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 11:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Secondary sources would be even better than primary souces (this isn't listed in any TV guides?). As neither are forthcoming, must assume non-notable.Yobmod (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.