Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dingoman productions
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:48, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:48, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dingoman productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Sources appear to be YouTube and interviews in local media (i.e., the Houston and Austin metro areas, the two places where the group have lived). Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Kinu t/c 17:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Also nominating their work for the same reasons:
- The Legend of Action Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both: The group only has coverage in local media. SL93 (talk) 01:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All - Most of the claims to notability the articles gives are invalid for establishing notability (ie, the number of hits on youtube, information on IMDB, etc), and the only media coverage was in very local news sources. Rorshacma (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.