Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Muneer Al-Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Muneer Al-Ali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. The most cited papers are 105, 82, 35, 5, 3 ... in google Scholar [1] ; in medicine, a very high citation-density field, this is not enough for notability. The standard of notability is science is world-wide, not merely being important in the context of a particular country. The low citation figures are despite much of the work being published in international journals, so I don;tthink this is the result of the publication bias that can be relevant to people in some subjects where publication is only in less-available national journals. The Quranic work is harder to judge, but it is apparently self-published. DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DGG Please, Journal of Urology, European Urology. Australia and NZ Medical Journal, Paraplegia(Now called Spinal Cord) and International Journal of Ethno-pharmacology are all high international medical forums...secondly ,to be able to author and self-publish English and Arabic books and translate an English book to Arabic is not a demerit...thirdly , Kirkus Indie is a renowned International reviewing establishment and its review cannot not be disregarded.--Haywi (talk) 11:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable medical doctor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable or with a positive outlook: Too Soon. gidonb (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Far WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.