Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emdad Sumon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emdad Sumon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are not from reliable source. All of the references are from unreliable, Non-notable news media. Mar11 (talk) 20:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (actually a couple of questions:)) is there a WP:COI with this article as it contains these words: "he had been beaten by my mother for seeing movie ..." and "Since 2004 he started my journey commercially ..." or is this a translation issue, and, more of a side issue, there is a Bangladesh company called Codex with a website codex.com.bd, almost identical to this article creator's name, Codexbd, is this a problem? Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From my understanding, this cannot be a translation issue; it is very likely that there is a COI. Also, the username obviously violates WP:CORPNAME. --nafSadh did say 15:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like Bangladeshis have learnt how to create Wikipedia "pages" and such articles keep popping up at the same rate at which Facebook pages used to pop up in early days of Facebook Pages. --nafSadh did say 15:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Purely promotional and no indication of notability. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the GNG and BLP. I'm not sure of it's being worthy of A7, but it is a "speedy" delete in my eyes. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.