Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empty with You
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:30, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Artwork (album). Black Kite (t) (c) 23:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Empty with You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:SONG. The song isn't even a single, and doesn't seem notable in the least. The fact that it has a video doesn't make it notable. — Dædαlus Contribs 05:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Artwork (album) per WP:MUSIC. I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable independent sources for this song. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been redirected twice already to Artwork (album), once by me and once by Tide Rolls. The same user keeps undirecting. Redirecting and protecting the redirect would be necessary.Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Elen of the Roads. There is nothing here that could not be mentioned at Artwork (album). A music video alone does not establish notability. The user that keeps recreating the article seems hell bent on keeping this article alive, so protection would probably be necessary. Fezmar9 (talk) 01:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.