Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Citybus
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:28, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:28, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn as If this were to be deleted then we may aswell cull every barely notable bus article here!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Glasgow Citybus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable bus company fails WP:CORP (Had prodded but AfD's quicker with decisions). Also Merge may be a better solution? ... Davey2010T 00:47, 15 October 2013
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 01:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 01:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Granted an operator that hasn't done much in its 14 years, but with 10 routes & 48 buses, and a reported acquisition[1] of 30 route[2] Henderson Travel (36 buses @ April 2010)[3] (cites still pending), not insignificant.Mo7838 (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Continued acquisitions isn't a reason for it to be kept, The company has no history whatsoever -
- Although merging may be a better solution? Davey2010T 17:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Continued acquisitions isn't a reason for it to be kept, The company has no history whatsoever -
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.