Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Honulik (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Connecticut USA. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 05:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Honulik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The survival this article experienced at the previous deletion discussion for about 15 articles shows that in such mass discussions people are willing to accept way too broad a definition of reliaable sources giving substantial coverage. One source is a website based in Wilton, Connecticut. The link no longer works, but it appears that this may have been where Honulik lived, and is an extremely local source. The Seattle Post-Inteligencer printed a pciture of her, but nothing else substantial, and it seems this was just one of many pictures taken at the competition. The Fairfield Citizen, the local paper for the greater NYC suburb she lived in in 2015, ran an article about her being one of 22 women competing in a reality television show. Although she came close to winning, she didn't, and the show does not even rate an article in Wikipedia. None of this is the type of coverage we would want to show that someone is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The creator of this article made the one edit to wikipedia of starting this article. I am not sure if this is at all relevant to the discussion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)q[reply]
Comment Noteworthiness is questionable; I'm leaning toward deletion. There's little of substance published on the subject. Majoreditor (talk) 03:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm unsure why I was tagged in this, given that I made a grand total of 4 edits here before today. Also, I found an archive version of the dead link and fixed that.--Auric talk 23:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Connecticut USA Definitely not notable enough for a separate article. The coverage is quite sparse. Subjects best known for winning a state level pageant are not inherently notable. I would prefer a redirect to Miss Connecticut USA instead of outright deletion as a mention is already present on the target page (in the list of winners). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Coverage is sparse.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss Connecticut USA; valid search term, and the subject is listed there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.