Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Kiss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Kiss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails pornbio as nominated only, first source is an interview and therefore primary not counting to notability, The second is now nonexistant but even if it was still there and a decent rs would not be enough alone. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails pornbio & gng. –Davey2010^Talk 12:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- fails appropriate notability guidelines and for lack of significant RS coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.