Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/US Army Generals

Reason: It's a great historical picture of the US Army generals at WWII, and almost all of the generals have high quality articles.
Articles this image appears in: Military history of the United States during World War II, United States Army, etc.
Creator: US Army; part of the collection of the Office of War Information

Support as nominator — Tomer T 00:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Great enc, not blurry by 1945 standards, high rez, and good composition. It's just old. The black and white is pardonable; but I'd much prefer a dust and scratch removal edit.--Here T oHelp 00:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support unrepeatable, historical significance, good enough quality. though it could do with a cleanup. Witty lama 01:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support that's a pretty good picture of a pretty incredible group of people in the same shot. gren グレン 04:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would be a super-duper featured pic if it was taken in color. Very encyclopedic and good quality (minimal noise and scratches, but nothing major) for a rare WWII pic. Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 09:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree With Jumping Cheese. Isn't there a program to put color into black and white pictures, or did I just dream of it? Flubeca 17:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above ^8thstar 17:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terrific bit of history well preserved. Very unique. Shmoopy
Well I don't know, historical significance but bad by all standards. Ericd 21:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Care to elaborate? Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 20:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomStar81 (Talk) 06:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:American World War II senior military officials, 1945.JPEG --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]