Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Film Critics Circle Awards 2011

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma Film Critics Circle Awards 2011

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oklahoma Film Critics Circle has been deleted as a non-notable, awards-mill organization. The awards of a non-notable organization are equally non-notable.

I am also nominating the following related pages (some of which have been tagged with notability / unreferenced tags for as long as six years) for the same reason, and as has been done previously with other awards of non-notable organizations.

--Tenebrae (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Well, Variety covered their awards in 2007, 2008, and 2009. On the other hand, The Dissolve mentioned them as more-or-less insignificant if you read between the lines. There's also the expected coverage in The Oklahoman, which is easy to discount as too local in scope. I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think that maybe we have too many articles on insignificant film critics and their societies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC) edit: added URL to article from The Dissolve, since I apparently forgot it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. The rationals (as discussed at the filmproject) for cutting back on these local "Critic associations and awards" are sound. MarnetteD|Talk 02:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If the Oklahoma Film Critics Circle isn't notable, then these sub-articles aren't notable either. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Lugnuts. Without entering the debate if Oklahoma Film Critics Circle is notable or not (as I haven't researched them), if it was decided they aren't notable for an article, their awards shouldn't be notable as well.--Gonnym (talk) 08:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cant find enough reliable sources to say the awards are notable. AlbinoFerret 14:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all other noms LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Lugnuts....William 11:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.