Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ollie Fenn
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:51, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:51, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ollie Fenn[edit]
- Ollie Fenn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This player has never appeared in a fully-professional league, which means he fails WP:NFOOTBALL; also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 12:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- per nom. As the League of Ireland is not fully pro, he fails WP:NSPORT. In the absence of significant coverage, he fails WP:GNG as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 17:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Fails the relevant notability guidelines. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of notability. Only one source, and merely being signed by a sports team isn't enough on its own to establish notability. Richwales (talk · contribs) 03:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.