Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddy Kennedy (politician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:33, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:33, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Paddy Kennedy (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable local politician. Fails WP:Politician Snappy (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Snappy (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —Snappy (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per above. — Cargoking talk 14:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Kittybrewster ☎ 14:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and compare / contrast with Catherine Murphy (politician) who should remain in.Red Hurley (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Catherine Murphy has achieved national office as a TD, and so she meets WP:Politician. Snappy (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability per WP:POLITICIAN, nor even any assertion of such notability. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.