Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerNap (recording)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PowerNap (recording)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an advertisement in nature and contains no credible information SaguratuS (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources found for the company itself, let alone for any of the claims made in the article. Tone is borderline close to a sales brochure, again making unsupported statements as to what the product "does". As an aside, the only source given (the maker's site) has an Important Disclaimer which basically says that the product doesn't necessarily do anything it claims. Arakunem^Talk 19:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – when I declined the speedy on this, it was based purely on the fact that it has been here for a while. Nearly two years on the clock and quite a few neutral edits. I compared the state of the article at various stages in its life to see if the spam had been injected at some time in the intervening period, but it had pretty much been like that from day one. It had also had a speedy declined in the past. So my declining it this time was purely procedural. But, yep, it's pretty much spam for a non-notable product. – B.hotep •talk• 22:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.