Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Péter Gervai
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:14, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 20:14, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. However, it would really have been helpful if some examples of sources that meet WP:BIO had been provided. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Péter Gervai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think it's good to show the origins of different types of Wikipedia and who created them. The article has references, although an expansion on personal life would be good. --Chip123456 (talk) 18:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a bit "incestuous" to have articles about people involved with WP who would otherwise not be notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep refs are all in Hungarian so I can't be sure but it appears notability is demonstrated. --Kvng (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep in that there is a need for development of the bio material and English references. Stormbay (talk) 21:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable person who helped create Wikipedia as it is. Interesting article, but should be expanded.Andrei.smolnikov (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think must be an article. Vadszederke Agnes Modis (talk) 21:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.