Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajnesh Singh
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:30, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:30, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. References will definitely help here. - Mailer Diablo 12:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rajnesh Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable StAnselm 15:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless a notability claim can be made for his company PATARA. YechielMan 16:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per YechielMan. Acalamari 01:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep The assertions of notability in the article suggest he may meet the notability standards (mostly his advocacy for the pacific islands), needs references. -- Monty845 03:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep He holds high offices in organizations that appear to be notable, although notability hasn't been established for PATARA. --76.202.59.116 03:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I think he's more N than the organization. (The organization is N only because its the only one in the geographic area--he seems to have wider recognition)DGG 03:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Very Weak Keep The person seems to be notable, but the article needs to cite its references. Moreover the article needs improvements like the content under Other Activities and Affiliations and Positions should be in chronological or reverse chronological order. Mayank Abhishek 05:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Seems to be notable.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.