Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy McNamara
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:45, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:45, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 06:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Randy_McNamara[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Randy_McNamara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
not notable FreedomByDesign 03:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All that there is any indication of is that he was associated with Werner Erhard - but there is no such thing as notability by association. Being an Est trainer does not make one notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. There seems to be a effort to list Landmark Forum Leaders on Wikipedia. I thought at first it might be attack-type activity, but it looks more promotional to me now. --Dhartung | Talk 06:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like it's time for some more cleanup. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable member of cultish racket. Nick mallory 09:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sm1969 (talk • contribs)
- Delete fails WP:BIO - a non notable person. Giggy UCP 00:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. No point for an article.Triplejumper 01:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable in an encyclopedic context. Alex Jackl 02:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.