Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Cable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regal Cable

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is probably a hoax; it does not exist & uses www.regalfilms.com as its website, where there is no mention of the subject. The article might be a creation of one of Bertrand101's sockpuppets as the subject is pointing to Santiago City (the vandal's 'residence') as its headquarters. the enjay 36 01:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG LavaBaron (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hoax. Regal sticks to films. If this were real it would be mentioned frequently in news reports. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any info aside from a directory listing. Other links suggest a cable splitter.--Lenticel ^(talk) 02:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient coverage from reliable sources to support notability. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 00:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.