Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard John Brandes (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:43, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Richard John Brandes[edit]

Richard John Brandes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources located sufficient to pass WP:GNG. First AfD from 2014 closed as no consensus because no one participated after 2 relists. ♠PMC(talk) 12:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If the sea of redlinks wasn't enough, both references are 404 and the domain for the external link to the equestrian sports company is for sale. Searches don't disclose any WP:RS coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- A7 material; we expect editors to try a bit harder to come up with sources :-). Just a basic directory listing at this point; no value to the readers. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.