Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Show Your Glory
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Show Your Glory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
De-PRODed article with no additional sources provided. Does not meet WP:NALBUMS Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Album with no evidence of notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Weak keepWas reviewed by Cross Rhythms and briefly mentioned in Charisma, which indicates that there might be more sources out there.--¿3family6 contribs 22:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)- Comment Multiple sources are needed to support notability. Only one present. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep I'm going to keep my vote a weak keep because of the Cross Rhythms coverage. Since it's only one source, my vote is a weak keep, and not a full keep. Correct me if I'm doing the vote wrong. I'm very new at this. Jair Crawford (talk) 02:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.