Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sins of the prophets
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:11, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:11, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted G11 by INeverCry (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). Housekeeping closure. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sins of the prophets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game mod; WP:GAMECRUFT. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Might be suitable for CSD but wasn't sure what exact category. Mkdwtalk 07:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable WP:GAMECRUFT, fails WP:GNG. (Could possibly meet CSD A1 if the definition were loosley-applied, but I think AfD is probably more suitable). — sparklism hey! 07:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable mod. If there happens to be a ref or two from a reliable source that demonstrates it being noteworthy out of the massive sea of fan-made mods out on the internet, then maybe put it as a single sentence in the respective Halo article or something. (Its a long ways from warranting its own article.) Sergecross73 msg me 16:19, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.