Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyway Recreation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. adequate consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skyway Recreation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet notability standards and seems to be written in a biased point of view, possibly by someone associated with the company. NikolaiHo 00:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 13:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find reliable sources supporting the article's subject. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete by all means as there's nothing close at all to the needed substance, and I frankly would've considered PROD. SwisterTwister talk 22:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.