Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surface Magazine Covers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surface Magazine Covers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:IINFO, no indication of independent notability. We don't have articles for covers of better known magazines like Sports Illustrated or Time, much less this one. PROD contested by article author. shoy (reactions) 13:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 14:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 14:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 14:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per nominator. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 14:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nom says it all. --Randykitty (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Not standard and not a notable magazine. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 15:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - added by COI editor for promotional reasons. Citobun (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Based on Nom. FairlySavvy (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- "corporate spam" and collection of trivial information. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.