Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syren (book)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:36, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 19:36, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Syren (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, not yet published. Fails WP:N, no significant sources. Was prodded, prod removed by author who disagreed with the insignificance of Amazon as a source. Has previously been deleted, but is more than just a repost because this time around, Amazon actually gives the title. Delete now, recreate once significant coverage exist. Huon (talk) 10:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. That Amazon reference, to amazon.de actually, I removed it. The book's existence doesn't make it notable anyway--when it does get to be notable, we'll get a bigger and better article. Drmies (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Captain-tucker (talk) 12:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article fails WP:BK, recreate in 2009 after its published and significant coverage exists. Since this is book 5 in an established series one would imagine that this will not be difficult but it's a little early for this article.--Captain-tucker (talk) 12:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - I also feel that it is too early for a separate page for the article, but we can merge it with the main Septimus Heap article for the time being including the book cover.--"Legolas" (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, too early. Mr. Absurd (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.