Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blondetourage
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:07, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Please note that The Chickbusters article did not have the afd notice tag on it, and as it was the only one discussed here that had any "doubt" as to whether to delete, therefore I did not delete it. Recommend relisting individually to open discussion. UPDATE, I see here that an IP removed the tag at the same time as adding substantial information to the article. Still, it was a couple of days ago. With the additions to the article, including several references (I didn't check to see if they were at all notable or help the article meet WP:GNG), it should still be relisted individually, if at all. Keeper | 76 00:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- HHH Pedigree also nominated two similar articles for deletion. I am merging these discussions per WP:BUNDLE here.
- The Blondetourage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- The Chickbusters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats) - Without the minor weekly matches, I see a no notable tag team without feuds HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Emma and Summer Rae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats) - A tag team in WWE farm territory. Not notable HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I think it's rather quite silly that we have these articles in the first place. Not only were they only active for a little over very small timespans, they literally did nothing of note. I would have speedied this if I didn't know better than to make such a rash and immediate call. Being perfectly frank, I don't see how someone can convince me that this is notable. Then again, AfD is exactly the place for me to find out. Feedback ☎ 22:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notable. --2.136.171.116 (talk) 23:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Never did anything notable as a team. The first two were never even officially tag teams unless I missed something. STATic message me! 03:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete 1 and 3 Both are hardly notable, and there was never any official recognition of the name for Kelly and Tiff. It was just a name used by Matt Striker in commentary I think. Comment 2 This one on the other hand might be salvagable. However it's a bit of a shoot because it's based on the real life friendship between the two, and that's hard to source. I'll abstain on it for that reason. BerleT (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is a friendship notable enough to be the basis of an article? I'm pretty sure many friendships are formed backstage in all of wrestling, we can't have articles for each one. Feedback ☎ 21:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete them all, not enough notability to be a separate article, I bet the info is already in the main articles and this is totally redundant. MPJ -US 13:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.